Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181834›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Efficacy and safety of anamorelin for cancer cachexia in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Yukinori Kurokawa, Yasuhiro Miyazaki, Takeshi Omori, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Naoki Shinno, Atsushi Takeno, Ryohei Kawabata, Yusuke Akamaru, Keijiro Sugimura and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exercise-nutrition prehabilitation attenuates lean body mass loss before gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Methodological and reporting considerations in real-world anamarin studies of gastric cancer-related cachexia.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Kazuyoshi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Yukinori KurokawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Yasuhiro MiyazakiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi OmoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshitomo YanagimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki ShinnoDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Atsushi TakenoDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Ryohei KawabataDepartment of Surgery, Sakai City Medical Center, Sakai, Japan.
Yusuke AkamaruDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Keijiro SugimuraDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Jin MatsuyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Yutaka KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Kindai Nara Hospital, Ikoma, Japan.
Kotaro YamashitaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Takuro SaitoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Tomomi YamadaDepartment of Medical Innovation Data Coordinating Center, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Osaka, Suita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anamorelin, a ghrelin receptor agonist, has shown efficacy in lung cancer cachexia. We conducted the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate its effects in gastric cancer cachexia. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial conducted across 10 hospitals in Japan, patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer and cachexia receiving chemotherapy (1st-3rd line) were randomized (1:1) to receive oral anamorelin 100 mg daily for 12 weeks (Group A) or no anamorelin (Group N). Randomization was conducted using a computer-generated sequence, stratified be participating institution and the type of surgical procedure. The primary endpoint was the change in lean body mass (LBM) at 8 weeks. The primary, secondary, and safety analyses were performed in the modified per-protocol population, which included all patients who received at least one dose of the assigned treatment and did not meet major protocol violations. This study is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs051210108. Findings: Between November 17, 2021 and July 4, 2024, a total of 217 patients were recruited. Of these, 14 patients did not meet the eligibility criteria, and 203 patients were subsequently randomised. Ultimately 101 in Group A and 97 in Group N were included in the final analysis. At 8 weeks, the increase in mean LBM was greater in Group A (+0.99 kg; 95% CI +0.34 to +1.64) compared to Group N (+0.14 kg; -0.49 to +0.77), but the between-group difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.063). As adverse events potentially related to anamorelin, hyperglycemia was observed in Group A: Grade 1-2 in 4 patients (4%) and Grade 3 in 1 patient (1%). No cases of hyperglycemia were observed in Group N. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Interpretation: Although no significant difference was observed between the two groups in the primary endpoint, anamorelin showed a trend toward increased LBM with good tolerability, suggesting potential benefit in gastric cancer cachexia. The randomized multicenter design strengthens the findings, though small sample size and treatment heterogeneity are limitations. These results support further evaluation of anamorelin to improve physical condition in this population with limited treatment options. Funding: Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Indexed as

AnamorelinCancer cachexiaGastric cancerLean body mass

Identifiers

PMID41181834
PMCPMC12572812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.