Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181830›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Machine learning-based phenotyping and assessment of treatment responses in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Rui Li, Yijun Liu, Zhen Zhao, Conghui Zhang, Wenyue Dong, Yu Qi, Jun Gao, Feng Gu, Brian E Carlson, Daniel A Beard and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rui LiDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yijun LiuInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhen ZhaoInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Conghui ZhangDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenyue DongSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yu QiDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jun GaoDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Feng GuDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Brian E CarlsonDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel A BeardDepartment of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Scott L HummelDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Baoxia ChenDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Haihui FanInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyan GuInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xinwei HuaDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yi-Da TangDepartment of Cardiology and Institute of Vascular Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of heart failure cases, yet effective treatments remain limited due to its clinical heterogeneity. This study aimed to identify distinct HFpEF phenotypes using machine-learning based algorithm and to compare treatment responses across different phenogroups. Methods: Our training cohort included 2147 hospitalized patients with HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% at Peking University Third Hospital (2014-2023). A two-stage DeepCluster model with a fully connected neural network was used to identify HFpEF phenogroups based on 107 demographic and clinical variables from electronic medical record (EMR). Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess patients' prognosis and treatment responses. The phenotyping model was validated internally using leave-one-out cross-validation method and externally with data from the TOPCAT clinical trial (n = 1696) and a well-characterized HFpEF patient cohort from the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS, n = 128). Findings: Three distinct HFpEF phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 815) had the highest burden of metabolic comorbidities, along with left ventricular hypertrophy, and both systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Phenogroup 2 (n = 608) comprised predominantly females with atrial fibrillation and structural abnormalities in the atria and right ventricle, with mainly diastolic dysfunction. Phenogroup 3 (n = 724) included younger men with unhealthy lifestyles, higher burdens of hyperlipidemia, liver dysfunction, and relatively normal cardiac morphology and function. Overall, phenogroup 1 had the highest risk of all-cause mortality. We didn't observe significant survival benefits from major HF therapies overall. However, in phenogroup 1, post-diagnostic use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) was associated with a 55% reduced risk of HF rehospitalization (HR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.99), while angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) were associated with a 66% lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.79). The effect of ARNI on all-cause mortality differed significantly across the three phenogroups (p for interaction = 0.048). In phenogroup 2, calcium channel blockers were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.38-0.99) and HF rehospitalization (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88). Furthermore, our DeepCluster model was internally validated with 96.0% consistency. In external validation in the TOPCAT and UMHS cohort, we observed consistent clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics across the three identified phenogroups. Interpretation: Machine learning-based algorithm identifies HFpEF phenogroups with distinct clinical features and treatment responses. This study suggests that SGLT2i and ARNI have a role in improving the outcomes in patients with metabolic comorbidities and both systolic and diastolic impairment, while calcium channel blockers were most likely to benefit HFpEF patients with atrial fibrillation. Future prospective studies are required to further validate these findings. Funding: This study was supported by the Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project (2024ZD0539000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82300291), Beijing Nova Program (20230484275), University of Michigan Medical School (UMMS) and Peking University Health Science Center (PKUHSC) Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research (BMU2023JI004), Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYDL2023009), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-5-003), Peking University Shi-Ji Jin-Yuan Medical Foundation (48014Y0243), and Beijing Excellent Clinical Research Program (BRWEP2024W014090203).

Indexed as

Heart failure with preserved ejection fractionMachine learningPhenomappingTreatment responses

Identifiers

PMID41181830
PMCPMC12572816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.