ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with toripalimab with or without celecoxib for patients with mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high, locally advanced, colorectal cancer (PICC): long-term outcomes of a single-centre, parallel-group, non-comparative, randomised phase 2 trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03926338 (Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade by Toripalimab With or Without Celecoxib in Mismatch-repair Deficient or Microsatellite Instability-high Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade by Toripalimab With or Without Celecoxib in Mismatch-repair Deficient or Microsatellite Instability-high Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer (PICC)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neoadjuvant therapy combined with immunotherapy for anal sphincter preservation rate, clinical efficacy, and safety in rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Targeting molecular and genetic pathways driving tumorigenesis for precision therapy in colorectal cancer.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- Watch and Wait Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Update From Results of Recent Clinical Trials.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Updates of CSCO guidelines for colorectal cancer version 2026.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer: current treatment paradigms, limitations and future perspectives.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Case Report: Ultrasound features of pathological complete response in middle and low rectal cancer with high microsatellite instability after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a case series.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Roles of immunosuppressive myeloid states in colorectal cancer checkpoint inhibitor non-response: single-cell and spatial proteomics, and reprogramming approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade has demonstrated high rates of pathological complete response in patients with mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high, locally advanced colorectal cancer. However, prospective data on long-term survival remain limited. Here, we report the 5-year outcomes from the phase 2 PICC study (NCT03926338) evaluating neoadjuvant toripalimab with or without celecoxib in this population. Methods: The PICC study was a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 study. A total of 34 patients with stage II-III mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer were enrolled between May 1, 2019, and April 1, 2021, and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant toripalimab plus celecoxib or toripalimab alone every 14 days for six cycles before surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response, which was previously met. Secondary endpoints included long-term oncologic outcomes, with 5-year overall, cancer-specific, disease-free, and event-free survival assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population. Quality of life was also evaluated as a secondary endpoint in this analysis. Data were analysed with a cutoff date of June 22, 2025. Findings: Of the 34 patients enrolled, all were assessable and randomised to toripalimab plus celecoxib (n = 17) or toripalimab monotherapy (n = 17). At a median follow-up of 61.9 months (IQR, 55.8-63.6), no disease recurrence was observed in either group. The 5-year overall survival rates were 100% (95% CI 100-100) and 94% (95% CI 84-99) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively. Cancer-specific survival at 5 years was 100% (95% CI 100-100) in both groups. The 5-year event-free survival rates were 100% (95% CI 100-100) and 93% (95% CI 80-99), and the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 100% (95% CI 100-100) and 93% (95% CI 80-99), respectively. Adverse events were mostly grade 1-2; two patients experienced grade ≥3 events during the perioperative treatment and two developed asymptomatic hypothyroidism during follow-up. At 3 years post-surgery, both groups reported high QLQ-C30 functional scores (86.7-100.0) and low symptom burden (mostly <10.0). QLQ-CR29 showed similarly preserved anxiety, body image (90.4-98.8), and low-to-moderate sexual interest (16.7-44.4), with low symptom burden (0-16.7). Interpretation: These results demonstrate encouraging long-term survival outcomes, and suggest ongoing evaluation of a therapeutic neoadjuvant toripalimab strategy, with or without celecoxib, for mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high localized colorectal cancer patients. Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Key Clinical Discipline of China, the Program of Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases, and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology-Junshi Biosciences Oncology Immunity Research Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.