ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Prevention of cardiovascular events in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a comprehensive network meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials using reconstructed individual patient's data.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- GLP-1-Based therapies for obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an umbrella review incorporating broader heart failure and cardiometabolic evidence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Glucagon-like Peptide-1-based and Emerging Cardiometabolic Therapies in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Linking Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Outcomes.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiometabolic therapies such as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) reduce clinical heart failure events in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, evidence for the benefit of one strategy or their combination is not well established. To optimize guidelines in this population, evidence of the most effective therapeutic options or strategies is needed. Methods: The present network meta-analysis used reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves of cardiometabolic therapies, identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (CENTRAL) up to March 31, 2025 (PROSPERO; CRD420251007431). The primary outcome was the composite of time to cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization. One-stage approach using stratified random-effect Cox regression model was used to re-estimate the treatment-effects for heart failure events. The relative effect of combination therapies was estimated using established methods for making indirect comparisons by an additive network meta-analysis model. Findings: Eight trials involving 25,440 patients with HFpEF were analyzed. The mean age of participants ranged between 61.7 and 72 years, 11,355 (45%) were women, 10,242 (40%) with type 2 diabetes, and 4841 (19%) with obesity. In these patients, the combination of MRA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA was the most effective for all clinical HF event (P-score 1.00). Compared with placebo, this combination reduced by 58% (HR 0.42 [0.31-0.56]) the risk of combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. The corresponding estimated absolute risk reduction (ARR) over a median follow-up of 2.5 years was 6.9% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.7%]), with a number need to treat (NNT) of 14 (95% CI 12-22). There was also a risk reduction of 73% (HR 0.27 [0.18-0.42]; ARR 6.2% [4.2%-7.5%]; NNT 16 [13-24]) for HF hospitalization, and 43% (HR 0.57 [0.44-0.72]; ARR 3.0% [1.9%-4.0%]; NNT 34 [26-52]) for cardiovascular death. Among the double combinations, MRA and GLP-1 RA strategies were the most effective in the reduction in the risk of HF hospitalization (P-score 0.77) and cardiovascular death (P-score 0.75), while SGLT2 and GLP-1 RA strategies were the most effective in the reduction in the risk of the composite endpoint (P-score 0.77). Interpretation: In patients with HF and LVEF > 40% for whom few treatment options are available, adjunctive combination of MRA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA to standard care has the potential to confer benefit in heart failure events (moderate quality of evidence). Furthermore, large-scale randomized combination therapies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm these findings, and to explore potential benefits in subgroups, optimized protocols, and inform clinical guidelines. Funding: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.