Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181824›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Prevention of cardiovascular events in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a comprehensive network meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials using reconstructed individual patient's data.

Alhassane Diallo, Miguel Carlos-Bolumbu, Philippe Duc, Florence Galtier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alhassane DialloDepartment of Public Health, University Gamal Abdel Nasser of Conakry, Conakry, Guinea.
Miguel Carlos-BolumbuEmergency Resuscitation Centre Hospitalier Sud Essonnes CHSE, Paris, France.
Philippe DucService de Réadaptation Cardiovasculaire Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Florence GaltierINSERM, Clinical Investigation Center 1411 & Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Univ Montpellier, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier Cedex 5 34295, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiometabolic therapies such as mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) reduce clinical heart failure events in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, evidence for the benefit of one strategy or their combination is not well established. To optimize guidelines in this population, evidence of the most effective therapeutic options or strategies is needed. Methods: The present network meta-analysis used reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves of cardiometabolic therapies, identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library (CENTRAL) up to March 31, 2025 (PROSPERO; CRD420251007431). The primary outcome was the composite of time to cardiovascular death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization. One-stage approach using stratified random-effect Cox regression model was used to re-estimate the treatment-effects for heart failure events. The relative effect of combination therapies was estimated using established methods for making indirect comparisons by an additive network meta-analysis model. Findings: Eight trials involving 25,440 patients with HFpEF were analyzed. The mean age of participants ranged between 61.7 and 72 years, 11,355 (45%) were women, 10,242 (40%) with type 2 diabetes, and 4841 (19%) with obesity. In these patients, the combination of MRA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA was the most effective for all clinical HF event (P-score 1.00). Compared with placebo, this combination reduced by 58% (HR 0.42 [0.31-0.56]) the risk of combined endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. The corresponding estimated absolute risk reduction (ARR) over a median follow-up of 2.5 years was 6.9% (95% CI, 4.6%-8.7%]), with a number need to treat (NNT) of 14 (95% CI 12-22). There was also a risk reduction of 73% (HR 0.27 [0.18-0.42]; ARR 6.2% [4.2%-7.5%]; NNT 16 [13-24]) for HF hospitalization, and 43% (HR 0.57 [0.44-0.72]; ARR 3.0% [1.9%-4.0%]; NNT 34 [26-52]) for cardiovascular death. Among the double combinations, MRA and GLP-1 RA strategies were the most effective in the reduction in the risk of HF hospitalization (P-score 0.77) and cardiovascular death (P-score 0.75), while SGLT2 and GLP-1 RA strategies were the most effective in the reduction in the risk of the composite endpoint (P-score 0.77). Interpretation: In patients with HF and LVEF > 40% for whom few treatment options are available, adjunctive combination of MRA, SGLT2i, and GLP-1 RA to standard care has the potential to confer benefit in heart failure events (moderate quality of evidence). Furthermore, large-scale randomized combination therapies with extended follow-up are needed to confirm these findings, and to explore potential benefits in subgroups, optimized protocols, and inform clinical guidelines. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Additive network meta-analysisHeart failure eventHFmEFHFpEFReconstructed individual patient data

Identifiers

PMID41181824
PMCPMC12572806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.