ReviewCureus2025
Quadriceps Tendon Ruptures: A Clinical Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quadriceps Tendon Rupture in an Emergency Department Patient with Left Knee Pain.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Structural and Functional Principles in Quadriceps Reconstruction.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quadriceps tendon ruptures (QTRs) are uncommon lower limb injuries that lead to pain, loss of active knee extension, and a prolonged rehabilitation course. They typically affect middle-aged or older adults, particularly in patients with comorbidities or degenerative tendon changes, and they most often occur during eccentric contraction when the knee suddenly flexes against an active quadriceps muscle. QTR is a clinical diagnosis. Although history and examination are the cornerstones of diagnosis, imaging is commonly used to confirm the diagnosis and to stage injury severity, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) functioning in many centres as the modality of choice to define site, severity, and tissue quality. Management is individualised and depends on injury-related factors such as tear extent, chronicity, tissue quality, and patient-related factors such as age, comorbidities, and functional demands. Selected partial-thickness tears in low-demand patients may be treated non-operatively, whereas operative repair is generally the mainstay for complete ruptures, high-grade partial tears with functional deficit, and chronic presentations. Evidence indicates broadly similar outcomes with transosseous tunnel and suture anchor repair. Current research into biological allograft augmentation and minimally invasive approaches is ongoing and may influence future practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.