ReviewCureus2025
Is Non-Operative Management With Closed Reduction and Casting a Safe Option for Gartland Type II Supracondylar Fractures? A Review of the Literature.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gartland type II supracondylar humerus fractures represent a spectrum of injuries in children where treatment remains controversial. Although current guidelines favour operative fixation, emerging evidence suggests that non-operative treatment may be appropriate for selected cases. This review summarises current literature on the safety and efficacy of non-operative management for Gartland type II fractures and identifies radiographic and clinical predictors of treatment success or failure. Retrospective and prospective studies comparing operative and non-operative approaches were analysed, with particular attention to predictors of reduction loss and the influence of the IIA/IIB Wilkins-modified subclassification. Success rates for non-operative treatment ranged from 70% to 90% in carefully selected cases, with loss of reduction occurring in 10%-25%, especially in fractures with extension deformity, sagittal obliquity or metaphyseal fragmentation. Subclassification improved prognostic accuracy: type IIA fractures were generally stable, while type IIB fractures had higher failure rates. However, these appeared best combined with other valuable radiographic predictors of stability, including the hourglass angle, humerocapitellar angle and anterior humeral line index. When alignment was maintained, functional outcomes were comparable between operative and non-operative groups. In conclusion, non-operative management with closed reduction and casting is safe for select Gartland type II fractures with favourable radiographic features. However, close follow-up with early repeat imaging is essential, and standardised selection criteria remain lacking. Future multicentre prospective studies are needed to validate radiographic thresholds and refine treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.