ReviewCureus2025
Distance-Based Educational Interventions for Empathy and Compassionate Care: A Systematic Review of International Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Educational and Professional Development Interventions to Strengthen Empathy, Compassion, and Relational Care Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy and compassionate care are essential components of high-quality healthcare, yet their integration into clinical education remains inconsistent. With the growing shift toward remote learning, distance-based educational interventions have emerged as promising tools for cultivating these competencies across healthcare professions. This study systematically reviewed international research examining the design, implementation, and effectiveness of distance-based educational interventions aimed at enhancing empathy and compassionate care among healthcare students and professionals. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Five databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2015 and June 2025. Eligible studies involved remote educational interventions explicitly targeting empathy and/or compassion with reported outcome measures. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted data on study design, population, intervention type, outcomes, and main findings. A narrative synthesis approach was used. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Intervention types included online mindfulness and self-compassion training (n = 9), virtual reality simulations (n = 6), role-play and simulation-based learning (n = 4), e-learning modules (n = 4), and narrative/reflection-based interventions (n = 1). Study designs encompassed quasi-experimental (n = 8), randomized controlled trials (n = 8), qualitative (n = 3), mixed-methods (n = 4), cross-sectional (n = 1), and retrospective analysis (n = 1). Empathy (n = 11) and self-compassion (n = 7) were the most commonly assessed outcomes. Twenty-one studies reported statistically significant improvements in at least one targeted domain. Distance-based interventions demonstrate strong potential to foster empathy and compassionate care in healthcare education. When designed to be interactive, experiential, and theory-driven, digital tools can effectively complement traditional curricula. Future research should emphasize methodological rigor, cultural adaptability, and long-term effectiveness to support sustainable integration into health professions education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.