Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181727›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knee Kinematics During Curved Walking.

Masahiko Shimamura, Kenta Horiuchi, Shinya Ogaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masahiko ShimamuraDivision of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, JPN.
Kenta HoriuchiDivision of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, JPN.
Shinya OgayaDepartment of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Walking in a straight line is considered the simplest form of locomotion for healthy individuals. However, in daily life, the ability to walk along curved paths is essential for tasks such as avoiding obstacles and turning corners. Evaluating gait patterns that involve directional changes along curved trajectories offers a more ecologically valid assessment of functional mobility, thereby contributing to the development of rehabilitation strategies that are better aligned with daily living activities. The present study aimed to investigate differences in knee joint rotational angles between straight and curved walking in older adults, using the point cluster technique. Furthermore, the study sought to determine whether distinct knee rotational patterns exist between gentle and sharp curved walking, both categorized under curved walking. Methods A total of 40 community-dwelling older adults participated in the study. Each participant performed one trial of straight walking, gentle curve walking (with a curvature radius of 2 meters), and sharp curve walking (with a curvature radius of 1 meter). During each walking condition, reflective markers attached to the body were recorded at a sampling frequency of 100 Hz. From the recorded trajectories of the reflective markers, knee joint angles for flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, and internal-external rotation were calculated. Results The maximum flexion angle was 45.3 ± 10.1° during straight walking, 19.1±9.8° during gentle curve walking, and 23.5 ± 11.7° during sharp curve walking, with a significant difference observed by ANOVA (p < 0.01). Additionally, post hoc multiple comparisons showed significant differences between straight walking and gentle curve walking (p < 0.01), straight walking and sharp curve walking (p<0.01), and gentle curve walking and sharp curve walking (p < 0.05). The maximum external rotation angle was 8.4 ± 7.17° during straight walking, -2.3 ± 7.6° during gentle curve walking, and -5.8 ± 8.2° during sharp curve walking, with a difference observed by ANOVA (p < 0.05). Additionally, post hoc multiple comparisons showed significant differences between straight walking and gentle curve walking (p < 0.05). Conclusion During walking along a curved path, individuals adopt a gait strategy that involves internally rotating the knee joint prior to entering the curve. The internal rotation angle of the knee joint during the early stance phase was greater in sharp curve walking than in gentle curve walking, indicating that a smaller curvature radius requires a larger internal rotation angle. These findings suggest that curved walking demands a greater range of knee joint rotation compared to straight walking.

Indexed as

elderlygaitkinematicknee angleknee rotation

Identifiers

PMID41181727
PMCPMC12579272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.