Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181726›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Myopraktikk (NO): A Narrative Review and Conceptual Hypothesis on Intrafasciomembranal Fluid Pressure, Biotensegrity, and Immediate Remote Myofascial Responses.

Stig Runar Hopen, Tor Arne Mjøen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stig Runar HopenPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The International Myopraktikk Organization, Beitstad, NOR.
Tor Arne MjøenResearch, The International Myopraktikk Organization, Beitstad, NOR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article introduces Myopraktikk (NO), a Norwegian-developed manual treatment method, where we clinically observe by palpation and visual inspection immediate local and remote responses that form the basis for a new hypothesis uniting intrafasciomembranal fluid pressure (IFMFP), Myopraktikk treatment chains, and the principle of biotensegrity in a single framework. Here, IFMFP refers to fluid pressure within fascial compartments, treatment chains describe functional pathways of force and tension that appear to respond collectively to local input, and biotensegrity denotes mechanical balance in an interconnected network. Muscle pain and myalgias are among the most common causes of pain and functional impairment, yet current models remain fragmented and leave major gaps. Why does nonspecific pain and stiffness arise without structural findings? Why do muscles feel "tight" at rest, and why do some tensions resolve quickly while others persist? What are muscle knots, trigger points (TrP), and fascial restrictions in regional pain conditions, and how might they connect to fibromyalgia (FM), overtraining syndrome (OTS), myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or even everyday complaints such as morning stiffness and weather-related pain? The IFMFP model postulates fluid accumulation and pressure rise within fascial spaces surrounding muscle fibers, bundles, and whole muscles, driven by overuse and impaired drainage, and conceptually comparable to intramuscular compartment pressure. This pressure alone might shorten and thicken tissue, and induce venous stasis, hypoxia, pH reduction, hyaluronan (HA) modification, and altered membrane permeability. Unlike traditional theories that see HA changes as causal, the IFMFP model proposes the reverse: pressure drives HA alterations and densification, enabling chronic dysfunction. A key clinical observation is that, by palpation and visual inspection, knots, TrP, tensions, and fascial cords are often felt to diminish during treatment, both locally and remotely, with patients and practitioners reporting perceived immediate changes in asymmetry, tonus, and stiffness. These findings suggest such structures are not static lesions but dynamic fluid pockets of increased IFMFP, dissolving as pressure is released. Based on clinical observations, the Myopraktikk treatment chains reveal patterns of movement, force, and tension, where local interventions may influence the entire chain through systemic equalization, in line with biotensegrity. By integrating biomechanical, physiological, and psychosocial factors, IFMFP offers a unifying mechanism that may link diverse myalgias within an expanded framework of myofascial pain syndrome. Myopraktikk therefore challenges established assumptions both as a treatment method and as a conceptual framework, where immediate, systemic, and reversible changes in myofascial tension, amplified by the physical expression of stress and thought, provide a fresh understanding of myalgias.

Indexed as

biotensegrityintrafasciomembranal fluid pressuremuscle knotsmuscle tensionmyalgiamyofascial pain syndromemyopraktikk (no)psychosocial paintension equalizationtrigger points

Identifiers

PMID41181726
PMCPMC12579487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.