ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
The quest for metabolic biomarkers of IVF outcomes: a meta-analysis and critical review.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic, environmental, and sex-specific programming of long-term health in Assisted Reproductive Technologies-conceived offspring†.Biology of reproduction · 2026Review
- Addressing multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: Current status, challenges, and solutions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Review
- Non-invasive biomarkers in assisted reproductive technologies, current evidence, clinical utility and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- The problem lies in the medium: challenges for diagnostic use of spent culture media in IVF.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Ovarian tissue quality assessment and fertility preservation strategies enabled by multi-omics and artificial intelligence: current applications and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spent culture media (SCM) analysis offers a promising, non-invasive strategy for assessing embryo viability and implantation potential in in vitro fertilization (IVF). By profiling the consumption and secretion of low molecular weight metabolites, SCM analysis may offer valuable insights into embryonic metabolic activity and developmental competence. Identifying reliable biomarkers in SCM has the potential to support more objective embryo selection and reduce time to pregnancy. This Bayesian meta-analysis synthesizes quantitative evidence from studies reporting metabolite concentrations in SCM in relation to IVF outcomes. From a comprehensive literature search identifying 175 studies, 10 met strict inclusion criteria, providing concentration-based data suitable for standardized effect size estimation. Using a multilevel modeling approach, we integrated data across heterogeneous study designs and found seven metabolites positively and ten negatively associated with favorable IVF outcomes. To complement this quantitative synthesis, we critically appraised 14 additional studies excluded from the meta-analysis due to missing calibration data or insufficient methodological transparency. This dual approach highlights recurring methodological challenges and underscores the need for standardized protocols, validated analytical methods, and transparent reporting in SCM research. Overall, the findings illustrate both the potential and the current limitations of SCM metabolic profiling. We provide practical recommendations for improving study design and reproducibility, with the goal of advancing SCM analysis toward clinically relevant biomarker validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.