ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Research on the healing concept based on systems psychology, local attachment and sustainable rural development.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rural sustainability efforts increasingly rely on not just physical infrastructure but also psychological and social mechanisms that shape long-term behavior. This study examines how emotional restoration resources contribute to pro-environmental behavior through their influence on place attachment. Drawing on systems psychology, we propose and test a three-pathway model connecting emotional healing (ERS), place attachment systems (PAS), and rural sustainability responses (PRS). Survey data were collected from 300 residents across three regions in China, and structural equation modeling (SEM) with bootstrap analysis was used to test mediating effects. Results show that access to emotional restoration resources significantly enhances emotional attachment, which mediates the impact on sustainability-related behaviors. The model demonstrates strong overall fit, and all hypothesized paths are supported. This suggests that emotional and symbolic factors-such as access to restorative spaces, intergenerational memory, and perceived trust-are central to motivating sustainable rural actions. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating emotional infrastructures into policy design to support deeper, community-driven sustainability transitions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.