ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The influence of visual attention on letter recognition and reading acquisition in Arabic.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The involvement of phonological awareness (PA), rapid automatized naming (RAN) and letter knowledge (LK) in Arabic reading achievement is well established, but evidence for a unique contribution of visual attention span (VAS) remains limited. Studies in Indo-European languages have reported a direct and unique influence of VAS on reading, a relationship that might also be expected in Arabic. However, the recognition of the complex Arabic letters may require substantial attentional resources, thereby reducing the direct contribution of VAS to reading. Methods: We assessed PA, RAN, LK and VAS in Arabic-speaking beginning readers, along with their reading fluency for both nonsense syllables and real words. Results: Strong relationships were found between all four predictors and both reading outcomes. LK and VAS were also substantially related. PA and VAS were unique predictors of reading, independent of RAN. However, the direct link between VAS and reading disappeared once LK was included as an additional predictor. VAS then only contributed indirectly to reading through its influence on LK. Discussion: These findings suggest that a large share of attentional resources is required for the parallel, fine-grained processing of the multiple visual features of Arabic letters, thus taxing the attentional resources available for processing higher-order units. We therefore argue that the relationship between VAS and reading is modulated by the language script.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.