Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181674›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The college students' engagement motivations in hot topics on social media: a study based on Q-method from China.

Ziqi Zhang, Yangsen Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ziqi ZhangSchool of Marxism, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.
Yangsen HuangSchool of Marxism, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of mobile internet, college students demonstrate significant enthusiasm for participating in discussions of hot topics on social media platforms. Existing research indicates that this engagement is driven by a variety of internal and external factors, including self-efficacy, psychological empowerment, and the influence of new media technologies. Despite these insights, there remains a scarcity of in-depth studies focusing on the primary motivations behind such behavior, particularly regarding individual differences among students. To address this gap, the present study employs Q methodology-a mixed-method approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques-to systematically analyze the subjective motivations of college students engaging in online trending topics. Through the analysis of participants' sorting of statement cards and subsequent factor extraction, four distinct engagement profiles were identified: self-referential rationalists, who prioritize practical benefits; values-driven advocates, who are driven by moral and social principles; interest-oriented participants, who seek to share personal opinions; and rights-protection oriented participants, who engage in discourse to protect their pre-existing views or group interests. These findings offer valuable insights for digital citizenship education, student support services, and media literacy programming. Rather than applying uniform approaches, educators and platform designers could develop tailored strategies that acknowledge these varied motivational profiles.

Indexed as

China contextengagement in hot topics on social mediagroup differencesmotivation of college studentsQ methodology

Identifiers

PMID41181674
PMCPMC12577062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.