ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The college students' engagement motivations in hot topics on social media: a study based on Q-method from China.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the era of mobile internet, college students demonstrate significant enthusiasm for participating in discussions of hot topics on social media platforms. Existing research indicates that this engagement is driven by a variety of internal and external factors, including self-efficacy, psychological empowerment, and the influence of new media technologies. Despite these insights, there remains a scarcity of in-depth studies focusing on the primary motivations behind such behavior, particularly regarding individual differences among students. To address this gap, the present study employs Q methodology-a mixed-method approach combining qualitative and quantitative techniques-to systematically analyze the subjective motivations of college students engaging in online trending topics. Through the analysis of participants' sorting of statement cards and subsequent factor extraction, four distinct engagement profiles were identified: self-referential rationalists, who prioritize practical benefits; values-driven advocates, who are driven by moral and social principles; interest-oriented participants, who seek to share personal opinions; and rights-protection oriented participants, who engage in discourse to protect their pre-existing views or group interests. These findings offer valuable insights for digital citizenship education, student support services, and media literacy programming. Rather than applying uniform approaches, educators and platform designers could develop tailored strategies that acknowledge these varied motivational profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.