ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2025
Role of catheter-based interventions in treating pulmonary embolism.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) ranks as the third leading cause of cardiovascular-related deaths in Western nations. Patients classified as high-risk (HR)-those exhibiting hemodynamic instability-require immediate interventions to restore blood flow. While intermediate-HR (IHR) individuals remain hemodynamically stable, they face a significant chance of clinical decline and thus need close and continuous observation. Effective risk assessment, mortality prediction, and therapeutic decision-making in these patients rely on a combination of clinical evaluation and imaging studies. Catheter-directed therapy (CDT) has emerged as a promising option, offering the ability to alleviate clot burden and reduce strain on the right ventricle, all while posing a lower risk of major bleeding compared to systemic thrombolysis. The growing adoption of CDT reflects its increasing relevance in PE treatment, especially when managed by specialized PE response teams that ensure individualized, multidisciplinary care. As clinical practices evolve, further studies and robust clinical trials are necessary to clearly define CDT's role in lowering the risks of complications and death among IHR PE patients. This article explores the current understanding and future direction of managing PE, focusing in the role of catheter-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.