ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Low-dose mivacurium facilitates laryngeal mask airway insertion in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore whether the application of mivacurium can facilitate laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion and benefit patients. Methods: A total of 167 patients undergoing hysteroscopy were randomly divided into mivacurium (group M) and control (group C) groups. The anesthesia induction scheme was mivacurium + sufentanil + propofol in group M, whereas mivacurium was replaced with saline in group C. The main outcome was the LMA insertion condition Secondary outcomes included attempts and elapsed time of LMA insertion, intraoperative anesthetic consumption, perioperative hemodynamics, postoperative sore throat (POST), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and agitation. Results: There was no difference in the baseline data (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in mouth opening; however, the incidence of swallowing, coughing, body movement, and pharyngeal spasm in group M was lower (p < 0.001), and the proportion of no resistance during LMA insertion was higher (80.5% vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001). The success rate of first-attempt LMA insertion in group M was higher (98.8% vs. 48.2%, p < 0.001), the elapsed time was shorter (16.9 (9.0) vs. 73.0 (91.5) s, p < 0.001), and fewer patients needed additional propofol (1.2% vs. 54.1%, p < 0.001). Blood staining on the LMA surface showed no significant difference, but the postoperative pharyngeal pain score in group M was lower (1.0 (1.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0), p < 0.001). Intraoperative propofol and remifentanil consumption, postoperative dizziness and nausea were lower in group M. Conclusion: Mivacurium facilitates LMA insertion and reduce intraoperative anesthetic consumption and adverse reactions, such as POST, nausea, and dizziness,so as to benefit the patient. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ChiCTR2500101122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.