ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Novel strategies for nanovaccine application in breast cancer treatment.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Polymer-Based Nanomaterials for Immune-Responsive Hepatocellular Carcinoma Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC), as the most common malignant tumor among women globally, faces numerous challenges in treatment. Currently, although the combination of surgical resection with various treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy can improve patient survival rates, most BC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage. Additionally, traditional small-molecule targeted anticancer drugs used during chemotherapy suffer from issues such as low target selectivity and frequent occurrence of acquired resistance, leading to suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. In recent years, tumor immunotherapy has achieved significant progress. Notably, cancer vaccines, as a strategy within tumor immunotherapy, represent a promising therapeutic approach by inducing tumor-specific immune responses. However, cancer vaccines also face several limitations, such as the strong systemic toxicity of immune adjuvants and the low immunogenicity of tumor antigens. An ideal cancer vaccine should sufficiently stimulate the body to generate a potent tumor-specific immune response while exhibiting low side effects. With innovations in nanotechnology within the medical field, nanotechnology can help overcome the limitations of traditional vaccines in the realm of vaccination. This review summarizes various nanomaterial carriers applied in the manufacturing of nanovaccines. These nanomaterials exhibit excellent biocompatibility, adjuvant activity, and immunogenicity. Furthermore, we discuss and summarize preparation strategies to enhance antitumor immune efficacy, including the use of tumor neoantigens to improve antigen presentation, the application of tumor cell membrane-based biomimetic nanotechnology to promote targeted delivery of nanovaccines, nanovaccine delivery platforms targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME), and novel strategies for combined application with nanovaccines. As an emerging strategy for BC immunotherapy, nanovaccines offer a novel approach to address the challenges of BC treatment and post-surgical recurrence by enabling precise delivery of tumor antigens, efficient activation of immune responses, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.