ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Leveraging artificial intelligence to validate traditional biomarkers and drug targets in liver cancer recovery: a mini review.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Digital oncology frameworks in Africa: a scoping review of architectural patterns, digital maturity, and data equity implications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a leading cause of cancer death, and recovery after therapy is shaped by heterogeneous etiologies, genomes and microenvironments. Targeted and immunotherapy combinations have broadened first-line options; yet durable benefit is uneven, and serum/imaging anchors (AFP, AFP-L3%, PIVKA-II, LI-RADS/mRECIST) incompletely resolve residual disease or functional restoration. In this review we summarise AI-enabled radiology, digital pathology and multi-omic/liquid-biopsy analytics that test and refine traditional biomarkers and drug-target readouts, and appraise translational opportunities in composite surveillance and recovery forecasting. We also discuss enduring challenges-including assay standardisation, spectrum bias, data leakage, domain shift and limited prospective external validation-that temper implementation. By integrating established anchors (AFP/AFP-L3%, PIVKA-II, ALBI, contrast-enhanced hallmarks) with AI-derived signals (radiomics/pathomics, cfDNA methylation) and pathway contexts (VEGF-VEGFR, WNT/β-catenin), emerging strategies align predictions with clinical endpoints, individualise therapy and chart hepatic function. Our synthesis provides an appraisal of AI-traditional integration in liver cancer recovery and outlines pragmatic standards-analytical robustness, transparent reporting and prospective, guideline-conformant evaluation-required for clinical adoption. We hope these insights will aid researchers and clinicians as they implement more effective, individualised monitoring and treatment pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.