SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
The clinical efficacy of herbal medicines containing leeches in the treatment of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical analysis of drug treatment trends for coronary heart disease in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a leading global cause of mortality, contributing to angina, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and sudden death. Traditional treatments, including antiplatelet drugs, statins, β-blockers, and coronary stents, have notable side effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding and liver or muscle dysfunction, with post-operative stent complications. Recent studies have identified bioactive substances in leeches, particularly the natural anticoagulant hirudin, which inhibits thrombin and may help mitigate complications of coronary artery disease. Hirudin inhibits thrombin, reduces platelet aggregation, and lowers thrombosis risk. This meta-analysis evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines containing leech in treating CHD, focusing on cardiovascular outcomes and adverse events. Methods: A systematic search of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang Data (Wanfang), and VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving leech-containing Chinese herbal medicines for CHD patients up until February 2025. Key efficacy outcomes analyzed were total effective rate, ECG efficacy, and hemorheological parameters, while adverse event rates assessed treatment safety. The meta-analysis used Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess efficacy, and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% CI for safety. Subgroup analyses examined the relationship between therapeutic effects and patient characteristics. Results: Sixty-five studies involving 7,221 patients were included. The results showed that leech-based treatments significantly improved the total effective rate [OR = 3.70, 95% CI (3.19, 4.31), Z = 17.05, P < 0.00001] and ECG efficacy [OR = 2.58, 95% CI (2.23, 2.99), P < 0.0001], along with significant improvements in hemorheological parameters. Subgroup analysis indicated leech treatments were particularly effective for improving the total effective rate, ECG outcomes, and hemorheological indices. Importantly, adverse event rates did not increase compared to conventional treatments. Conclusion: Chinese herbal medicines containing leeches provide significant clinical benefits for CHD, particularly in improving ECG outcomes and blood parameters. These findings suggest that leech-based treatments are both effective and safe, with no increase in adverse events. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier CRD42024564675.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.