ArticleFujita medical journal2025
A retrospective study on hormone replacement therapy after ovarian cancer surgery at our hospital.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is considered for ovarian cancer patients who develop menopausal symptoms, dyslipidemia, and osteoporosis due to iatrogenic menopause caused by surgery or anticancer drug treatment. However, there have been few reports on HRT administration methods and those that evaluate cancer recurrence and complications of HRT. Methods: We examined the administration method, adverse reactions and cancer recurrence in 28 patients who received HRT after ovarian cancer surgery at our hospital. Results: All patients received estradiol monotherapy, and cancer recurrence was observed in four patients (14.3%); adverse reactions included skin eruption in two patients (7.1%), there were no other serious adverse reactions noted. Conclusion: The method and duration of HRT administration and the timing of HRT discontinuation remain debated. Thus, a large-scale survey and standardization of HRT administration methods after ovarian cancer surgery in Japan are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.