ArticleFujita medical journal2025
Exploring the sound environment in neonatal intensive care units as perceived by medical professionals.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What's that noise-tackling sound pollution in the NICU: a systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify specific care scenarios and procedures perceived as noisy or quiet by medical professionals working in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and elucidate factors influencing the sound environment that may affect preterm infants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 nurses and eight doctors working in the NICU. Participants identified care and procedural situations perceived as noisy or quiet for preterm infants. Specific sound environment factors that could potentially affect preterm infants were extracted and visualized to demonstrate the interrelationships among these factors. Results: Medical professionals recognized that noise levels fluctuated based on specific care scenarios, with sudden sounds and background noises amplifying disturbances in otherwise quiet settings. Participants also identified the overlap of multiple noise sources in various locations, including continuous beeping or other disruptive noises, as potentially affecting preterm infants. Conclusion: Because noise levels in the NICU fluctuate during specific care scenarios, comparative verification of noise levels inside and outside the incubator is necessary. The present results revealed that even in periods perceived as quiet, sudden sounds and background noises may amplify disturbances to preterm infants. Furthermore, because overlapping noise sources during care and procedures affect the sound environment, empirical evaluation of sound quality by measuring noise during quiet hours is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.