Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181575›Full record

ArticleFujita medical journal2025

Exploring the sound environment in neonatal intensive care units as perceived by medical professionals.

Masato Sugiura, Jun Shimizu, Kazuteru Niinomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fujita medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Masato SugiuraFaculty of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan.
Jun ShimizuFaculty of Global Nursing, Otemae University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuteru NiinomiDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify specific care scenarios and procedures perceived as noisy or quiet by medical professionals working in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and elucidate factors influencing the sound environment that may affect preterm infants. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 nurses and eight doctors working in the NICU. Participants identified care and procedural situations perceived as noisy or quiet for preterm infants. Specific sound environment factors that could potentially affect preterm infants were extracted and visualized to demonstrate the interrelationships among these factors. Results: Medical professionals recognized that noise levels fluctuated based on specific care scenarios, with sudden sounds and background noises amplifying disturbances in otherwise quiet settings. Participants also identified the overlap of multiple noise sources in various locations, including continuous beeping or other disruptive noises, as potentially affecting preterm infants. Conclusion: Because noise levels in the NICU fluctuate during specific care scenarios, comparative verification of noise levels inside and outside the incubator is necessary. The present results revealed that even in periods perceived as quiet, sudden sounds and background noises may amplify disturbances to preterm infants. Furthermore, because overlapping noise sources during care and procedures affect the sound environment, empirical evaluation of sound quality by measuring noise during quiet hours is recommended.

Indexed as

Medical professionalsNeonatal intensive care unitNoisePreterm infantsSound environment

Identifiers

PMID41181575
PMCPMC12576400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.