Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181561›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Science mapping of COVID-19 contributions in primary health care by OECD countries: A machine learning approach.

Muhammet Damar, Benita Hosseini, Andrew David Pinto, Omer Aydin, Umit Cali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muhammet DamarFethiye Faculty of Business Administration, Management Information Systems, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3985-3073
Benita HosseiniUpstream Lab, MAP, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew David PintoUpstream Lab, MAP, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Omer AydinComputer Science, Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-4881
Umit CaliDepartment of Electric Power Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-0479

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Our study comprehensively assesses how Canada and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries have supported researchers, research institutes and their scientific productivity in primary health care (PHC), one of the areas most affected by COVID-19. Method: We analyzed research contributions among OECD countries and assessed their scientific productivity during COVID-19 using bibliometric methods and machine learning techniques. Our analysis includes co-authorship networks, funding patterns, co-citation analysis, thematic mapping, factor analysis, and topic modeling through latent Dirichlet allocation. Results: This study analyzes 1061 articles and review papers involving 5765 researchers from OECD countries. PHC systems played a crucial role in the global response to SARS-CoV2 but faced significant challenges. Canada ranks third in PHC research output and forth in COVID-19 research among OECD nations. The findings reveal Canada's strong collaborative ties with countries such as the USA, UK, and Australia. However, disparities in PHC scientific productivity across OECD countries remain, with some nations showing minimal progress. Conclusions: Our study highlights the importance of academic collaboration in addressing pandemic-related crises. The study recommends enhancing international collaboration, led by countries such as Canada, the USA, and the UK, to strengthen PHC systems during global health crises. It is deemed necessary to include experts and academics from the field of PHC in such structures. It also emphasizes the need for academic journals to improve transparency in funding sources through automated extraction of bibliometric data from platforms such as Web of Science and Scopus, which is crucial for shaping future health and education policies.

Indexed as

CanadaCOVID-19machine learningOECD countriesprimary health careresearch fundingscientific productivity

Identifiers

PMID41181561
PMCPMC12576027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.