ArticleDigital health
Assessment of information quality and reliability of short videos related to lumbar disc herniation on selected video platforms.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluating pulpitis-related content on Chinese social media: platform comparison, dental practitioner impact and associated factors.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Assessing the reliability and quality of avascular necrosis of the femoral head content on social media: a cross-sectional content analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of femoral neck fracture educational short videos: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of knee osteoarthritis-related information on short video platforms in China: a multi-method cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- The impact of algorithm-driven exposure to disease-related short videos on rehabilitation outcomes in lumbar disc herniation patients: content heterogeneity and psychological mediating mechanisms.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lumbar disc herniation is a common chronic condition among working people. In China, the number of popular scientific videos on health and disease knowledge is increasing on short video platforms, but there is still a lack of sufficient research to evaluate the quality of these short videos. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability, and content completeness of lumbar disc herniation related videos posted on four major short video platforms in China. Methods: The keyword "lumbar disc herniation" was entered into four major Chinese short video platforms; videos were sorted by the number of likes, and the top 100 were collected. After sifting through the collected videos, their quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), DISCERN tool, and content completeness score. Results: A total of 400 videos were collected from four short video platforms, Douyin, Bilibili, Kuaishou, and Xiaohongshu, leaving 384 videos after screening. The largest group of uploaders was orthopedic surgeons (24.2%), while the smallest was organizations (2.6%). For short video content, the most frequently mentioned content was treatment (83.9%), followed by diagnosis (14.8%). The average number of likes for each video was 25,998. The mean GQS score, DISCERN score and content completeness score of these videos were 2 ± 0.85, 1.71 ± 0.76, and 1.38 ± 0.76. There was little difference in content completeness among the platforms, but Douyin had higher video quality scores. Conclusions: In summary, the overall quality scores of lumbar disc herniation-related short videos were not high. Short video quality on Douyin was higher than that of other platforms. The quality of videos posted by orthopedic surgeons was better than that posted by other groups. Short videos with a high number of likes tend to have higher GQS and DISCERN scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.