Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181551›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The quality and content of gonorrhea-related short videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study.

Kaidi Zhao, Junlan Yang, Jiashu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaidi ZhaoDepartment of Dermatology, Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6716-3179
Junlan YangDepartment of Dermatology, Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jiashu LiuDepartment of Dermatology, Xi'an Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-7573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gonorrhea is a common sexually transmitted disease that remains highly prevalent worldwide. Social media platforms such as TikTok have become important sources of public health information, yet the quality and reliability of video content on these platforms remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, and reliability of gonorrhea-related short videos on TikTok. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 71 gonorrhea-related short videos on TikTok. Video characteristics, uploader types, and content themes were extracted. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool were used to assess video quality and reliability. Correlation analysis was performed between video metrics and quality scores. Results: The videos were generally short in duration (median: 49.00 s) but exhibited high user engagement. Common topics included clinical manifestations (64.79%), transmission routes (47.89%), and diagnosis (45.07%), while prevention, treatment and prognosis were less frequently discussed. The main uploaders were dermatologists, urologists, and individual users. Videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had significantly higher GQS scores than those from individual users, with a similar but statistically insignificant trend in mDISCERN scores. Positive correlations were found among engagement metrics (likes, favorites, comments, and shares), but no correlation was observed between engagement and video quality. Conclusions: Gonorrhea-related TikTok videos are highly interactive but generally lack in quality, reliability, and content coverage. Increasing professional involvement and improving platform-level content regulation are essential to enhance the educational value of health information delivered via TikTok platforms.

Indexed as

Gonorrheahealth informationinformation qualityshort videoTikTok

Identifiers

PMID41181551
PMCPMC12575989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.