ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Sessile serrated lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surveillance Outcomes in an Australian Cohort Undergoing Piecemeal Polypectomy for Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Lesions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some studies have reported that approximately 50% of appendiceal lesions are sessile serrated lesions (SSLs). Traditionally, surgical intervention has been the preferred method. Endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) serve as alternative treatments for lesions at the appendiceal orifice (AO). However, EMR is not appropriate when the lesion margin within the AO cannot be visualized. When lesions extend into the lumen, extended laparoscopic appendectomy (ELA) or combined surgery can be used to resect the lesions. Compared with traditional surgery and EMR, ELA or combined surgery is a safer and more precise option that preserves the function of the ileocecal region. However, the need for coordination between surgeons and endoscopists, along with the requirement for staged procedures and multiple bowel preparations, increases the complexity of the treatment. In recent years, with the advancement of endoscopic full-thickness resection, endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA) has been used to treat SSLs involving the AO. The use of choledochoscopy in conjunction with ETA can further enhance treatment precision. This integrated approach holds promise for replacing the combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgical techniques. However, additional data are required to confirm its safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.