Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181541›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Endoscopic submucosal dissection, transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection, and transanal minimally invasive surgery in rectal lesions.

Enver Ilhan, Fevzi Cengiz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Enver IlhanDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Izmir Faculty of Medicine, Izmir City Hospital, İzmir 35040, Türkiye. enverhan60@gmail.com.
Fevzi CengizDepartment of General Surgery, Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir 35150, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of rectal lesions has been significantly enhanced by advancements in endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical techniques. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection (TEM-ESD), and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) offer precision and reduced morbidity for treating these conditions. This minireview evaluates the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ESD, TEM-ESD, and TAMIS, highlighting their roles in the contemporary management of rectal lesions. A desktop research study with a particular focus on ESD, TEM-ESD, and TAMIS for rectal lesions was conducted. Key outcomes assessed include complete resection rates, complication rates, recurrence rates, and functional outcomes following the procedure. ESD is noted for its high rate of

Indexed as

Early rectal cancerEn bloc resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionLocal excision techniquesMinimally invasive colorectal surgeryRectal adenomasTransanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissectionTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID41181541
PMCPMC12576654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.