Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181536›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025

Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Michał Spychalski, Zofia Orzeszko, Przemysław Kasprzyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michał SpychalskiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz 90647, Lodzkie, Poland.
Zofia OrzeszkoDepartment of Surgery, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Krakow 31061, Malopolskie, Poland. zofia.orzeszko@uj.edu.pl.
Przemysław KasprzykCenter of Bowel Treatment, Brzeziny Specialist Hospital, Brzeziny 95060, Lodzkie, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as a safe and sufficient method of treatment of superficial lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Advances in endoscopic closure techniques have developed alongside improvements in resection methods. Recent innovations, such as endoscopic hand suturing and new through-the-scope clips and systems, are transforming the field. Along with new devices, the combined methods of closure are developed. Embracing these new techniques can lead to enhanced recovery and reduced complications, marking an important milestone in medical practice. In fact, the European Society of GI Endoscopy recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD; however, endoscopic closure is strongly advised for immediate perforations. Furthermore, the American Gastroenterology Association provides a detailed expert review on managing perforations in the upper and lower GI tract based on endoscopic closure techniques. On the other hand, the most common postprocedural complications following ESD are delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and stricture formation. According to recent literature, properly managing the post-ESD defect may reduce the risk of these complications. This review aims to explore novel approaches for managing post-ESD defects and intraprocedural complications to enhance safety and improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Endoscopic closure techniquesEndoscopic hand suturingEndoscopic submucosal dissectionEndoscopyMantis clipOverStitch systemOver-the-scope-clipsThrough-the-scope clipsX-Tack endoscopic HeliX tacking system

Identifiers

PMID41181536
PMCPMC12576643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.