ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Advancements in endoscopic closure: Embracing a new era of managing complications and postprocedural defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as a safe and sufficient method of treatment of superficial lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Advances in endoscopic closure techniques have developed alongside improvements in resection methods. Recent innovations, such as endoscopic hand suturing and new through-the-scope clips and systems, are transforming the field. Along with new devices, the combined methods of closure are developed. Embracing these new techniques can lead to enhanced recovery and reduced complications, marking an important milestone in medical practice. In fact, the European Society of GI Endoscopy recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD; however, endoscopic closure is strongly advised for immediate perforations. Furthermore, the American Gastroenterology Association provides a detailed expert review on managing perforations in the upper and lower GI tract based on endoscopic closure techniques. On the other hand, the most common postprocedural complications following ESD are delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and stricture formation. According to recent literature, properly managing the post-ESD defect may reduce the risk of these complications. This review aims to explore novel approaches for managing post-ESD defects and intraprocedural complications to enhance safety and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.