ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2025
Postoperative perforation risk after endoscopic removal of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Development and validation of a predictive nomogram.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning model integrating [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, and gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) account for the majority of these tumors. Currently, endoscopic removal (ER) is increasingly adopted as a minimally invasive treatment. However, postoperative perforation remains a critical complication, necessitating robust prediction tools.
aimTo identify the risk factors and develop a validated nomogram for predicting perforation after ER of gGISTs.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed the patients undergoing ER at Fuyang People's Hospital from 2019 to 2024. Clinical data, including tumor size, location, and procedural details, were collected and analyzed. The risk factors were identified
resultsAmong 301 patients, the perforation rate was 6.3%. Multivariate analysis identified tumor size (odds ratio = 4.699, 95% confidence interval: 2.382-9.267,
conclusionThis study identified that tumor size and location were independent risk factors, and provides a clinically actionable nomogram for evaluating and predicting postoperative perforation risk in gGISTs treated with ER, facilitating preprocedural planning and risk monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.