ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
Considerations for designing socially assistive robots for older adults.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Interactive robots for healthcare and participation.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social robots have the potential to support the health activities of older adults. However, they need to be designed for their specific needs; be accepted by and useful to them; and be integrated into their healthcare ecosystem and care network. We explored the research literature to determine the evidence base to guide design considerations necessary for socially assistive robots (SARs) for older adults in the context of healthcare. We identified various elements of the user-centered design of SARs to meet the needs of older adults within the constraints of a home environment. We emphasized the potential benefits of SARs in empowering older adults and supporting their autonomy for health applications. We identified research gaps and provided a road map for future development and deployment to enhance SAR functionality within digital health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.