ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Satisfaction survey of early clinical exposure in medical students: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early clinical exposure (ECE) is a teaching method that fosters the exposure of medical students to the patients in their early years of medical school. ECE motivates students in various ways, improving their academic performance, clinical skills, communication, and confidence. This study looks at how third-year medical students view the ECE program over the long term. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving 93 third-year medical students participating in an ECE program from December to March 2023 in the emergency ward. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire in two phases, immediately after the ECE program and after the students officially transitioned to the clinical training in the conventional curriculum. For qualitative analysis, Colaizzi's seven-step method was employed. The Mann-Whitney Results: Out of 93 participants, 80 completed the questionnaire. Initial responses showed high satisfaction, with 93.75% of students reporting high satisfaction scores in terms of benefits for the clinical years, helping to adapt to the clinical environment, and giving confidence. However, after officially transitioning into clinical training, long-term survey shows high satisfaction scores significantly declined to 76.25% ( Discussion: The ECE program significantly improved students' confidence and orientation to clinical environments. The observed decline in long-term satisfaction suggests a gap between the structured ECE experience and the complexities of real clinical practice. However, integration of ECE with the conventional medical education curriculum is essential to sustain students' motivation and confidence from the early years of college.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.