ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
CT findings in surgically treated focal pancreatic disease - a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "CT findings in surgically treated focal pancreatic disease - a retrospective study".Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Focal pancreatitis constitutes a classic mimicker of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Knowledge of characteristic findings in chronic and autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is important to avoid unnecessary surgery. Purpose: To retrospectively investigate CT (computed tomography) imaging features of AIP and chronic pancreatitis (CP) mimicking PDAC in surgically resected patients. Material and Methods: A search in the pancreatic database in our tertiary reference center was performed, and all patients undergoing pancreatic resection during the past 10 years with a final diagnosis of AIP were initially identified. Matched groups of patients with focal CP and PDAC were extracted from the same database. A control group of patients with diffuse AIP was identified from the local benign multidisciplinary team meetings. Two experienced abdominal radiologists reviewed all patients' imaging and reached a consensus decision blinded to the diagnoses. Characteristic imaging features and attenuation values were recorded. Results: A total cohort of 41 patients (14 PDAC, 15 CP, and 12 focal AIP) who underwent surgery were included, along with 15 controls with diffuse AIP and no surgery. Both benign conditions showed contrast enhancement patterns and imaging features similar to PDAC. All groups were hypoattenuating without any significant differences in enhancement patterns. Conclusion: Differentiating focal autoimmune and CP from PDAC may be challenging despite knowledge of the characteristic CT imaging findings. Further diagnostic tests such as magnetic resonance imaging, IgG4 testing, and endoscopic ultrasound with biopsy should be performed in equivocal cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.