ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Looking at the tip of the iceberg: a case report discussing the diagnosis and management of coexistent diaphragmatic and thoracic endometriosis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unexpected coexistence of diaphragmatic and abdominal wall endometriosis in a case of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diaphragmatic endometriosis is considered the most common extrapelvic localization of endometriosis. Thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES) involves endometriotic deposits in the pleura and lungs. Diaphragmatic endometriosis and TES are often discussed as separate entities, although emerging evidence suggests a possible correlation. This case report highlights a patient with concurrent diaphragmatic and thoracic endometriosis. Case presentation: A 31-year-old nulligravid patient presented with dyspnea and acute right-sided chest pain. The patient's symptoms had a spontaneous onset and started in the week preceding her presentation. Six months earlier, the patient received an uncomplicated robotic-assisted excisional surgery for pelvic endometriosis, during which diaphragmatic endometriosis was spotted [#Enzian P0, O1/1, T3/3, A3, B2/2, C3, FI (sigmoid colon), F (diaphragm)]. Computed tomography scan revealed right-sided pneumothorax. Given her history, TES was suspected. A multidisciplinary surgical plan was implemented. Intraoperatively, the extension of thoracic endometriosis was much more than that of the disease observed on the peritoneal part of the diaphragm. Surgical excision of diaphragmatic lesions and apical pleurectomy were performed, followed by talc pleurodesis. The patient had a favorable postoperative recovery and remained symptom-free after 6 months. Clinical discussion: This case highlights the potential association between diaphragmatic endometriosis and TES, necessitating a high index of suspicion. Given the limitations of non-invasive imaging, surgical exploration remains crucial for the diagnosis and treatment. Studies suggest that diaphragmatic resection and postoperative hormonal therapy reduce recurrence rates. This case reinforces the need for a combined abdominothoracic approach in severly symptomatic patients. Conclusions: This report demonstrates the safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopy and laparoscopic surgery in treating coexistent diaphragmatic and thoracic endometriosis. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial for optimizing outcomes, and a high degree of clinical suspicion is necessary to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment, especially given the limitations of non-invasive diagnostic modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.