ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Nursing for cancer patients: research hotspots and trends through bibliometric and visualization analysis based on Web of Science (2014-2024).
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the global cancer burden intensifies, the significance of cancer patient care practices in alleviating symptoms, enhancing quality of life, and promoting treatment adherence has become increasingly pronounced. Cancer patients encounter unique care needs arising from the complexities of the disease and the side effects of treatment, which has catalyzed rapid growth in research within this field. Nevertheless, there is currently a deficiency in systematic reviews of the research hotspots and trends in cancer care. Bibliometric and scientific mapping analyses serve as robust tools for uncovering the dynamic evolution of disciplines. Objective: This research was based on the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database and retrieved literature related to cancer patient care practices from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2024. Using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and bibliometric tools, a bibliometric analysis was conducted on the number of published papers, authors, institutions, keywords, and more, with visual mapping employed to explore research hotspots and development trends. Results: This study analyzed a total of 428 documents, encompassing 1435 institutions across 46 countries and published in 138 journals. Since 2014, there has been a rapid increase in the annual publication volume. Notably, Chinese publications have led in both quantity and citations. Among these, Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China has produced the highest number of publications. The most prolific author in this field is Wang Lin, while the most cited author is Riitta Suhonen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.