ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis vs Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A Propensity-Matched, Retrospective Database Analysis of Medical Complications and 2-Year Nonunion Rates.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankle arthrodesis (AA) is a common treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, chronic instability, and degenerative deformity. Although minimally invasive arthroscopic techniques may reduce soft tissue disruption, postoperative pain, and related morbidity, open techniques may be beneficial for treatment of patients with aberrant anatomy, insufficient bone stock, or complex deformity. This study aimed to determine whether arthroscopic AA is associated with lower rates of adverse events, pseudarthrosis, and health care use compared with open AA techniques at short-term and long-term intervals. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the TriNetX research network. Patients undergoing AA were identified using Results: The arthroscopic AA cohort experienced significantly lower rates of any adverse event, infection, and hospital admission within the 30-day and 90-day outcome windows. Arthroscopic AA was associated with fewer emergency department visits and wound dehiscence within 90 days of surgery. A diagnosed pseudarthrosis within 2 years was more common in the open arthrodesis cohort. Rates of short-term myocardial infarction, cerebral infarct, transfusion, pulmonary embolism, and hematoma did not differ. Conclusion: Arthroscopic AA was associated with significantly lower rates of medical complications at the short-term intervals, in addition to lower rates of nonunion within 2 years. Although observational, propensity-matched data are consistent with fewer short-term medical complications and lower 2-year nonunion after arthroscopic AA, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the inability to assess the degree of coronal or sagittal plane deformity in the included cases. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.