ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Early Mortality Prediction in Septic Patients Using Routine Post-Diagnosis Clinical Data: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of high-risk patients is crucial for improving outcomes. This study aims to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict early 7-day mortality in sepsis patients based on routine clinical data obtained immediately after diagnosis. Methods: Data were collected from four tertiary hospitals across diverse regions in China. Seven ML algorithms were employed to construct the prediction model. Model performance was evaluated using Area Under the Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC), calibration curves, Decision Curve Analysis (DCA), and clinical application. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to interpret the model and identify key predictors. Results: Among 8729 patients, 752 (8.6%) died within 7 days after admission. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.767 (95% CI: 0.748-0.787) in training set, outperforming traditional scoring systems such as APACHE II (AUROC: 0.710, 95% CI: 0.698-0.721) and SOFA (AUROC: 0.718, 95% CI: 0.707-0.729). This performance was consistent in the test set. Key predictors of early mortality included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), blood chloride, and albumin levels. The SHAP analysis provided interpretable insights into the model. Conclusion: We developed a machine learning model to predict the risk of early 7-day mortality in sepsis patients based on routine clinical data obtained immediately after diagnosis and validated its potential as a clinically reliable tool, achieving an AUROC of 0.767 in the training set. The use of SHAP-based interpretation enhances model interpretability, enabling clinicians to better understand the factors influencing mortality, identify high-risk patients early, and implement timely interventions to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.