Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181299›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Post-Cataract Surgery Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis from 2008-2023.

Nuntachai Surawatsatien, Pimpetch Kasetsuwan, Jipada Pruksacholavit, Sunee Chansangpetch, Wasee Tulvatana, Pear Ferreira Pongsachareonnont, Paweena Susantitaphong, Usanee Reinprayoon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nuntachai SurawatsatienCenter of Excellence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4357-8289
Pimpetch KasetsuwanDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0005-7630-4304
Jipada PruksacholavitDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sunee ChansangpetchDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8996-2868
Wasee TulvatanaDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5421-5619
Pear Ferreira PongsachareonnontCenter of Excellence in Retina, Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2074-1629
Paweena SusantitaphongDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9813-9219
Usanee ReinprayoonDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3660-3538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative endophthalmitis remains a significant concern following cataract surgery with a potential for severe vision loss. Although numerous clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been published worldwide, they offer differing recommendations for prophylactic measures. This systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate existing guidelines for endophthalmitis prophylaxis after cataract surgery. A comprehensive search including citation and gray literature search was conducted. Authors' contact with peer international ophthalmologists was also employed. Clinical practice guidelines specifically on post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis prophylaxis published between 2008 and 2023 were included in this study. Quality assessment was done using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. Twenty-one guidelines were identified, assessed, and extracted. Intracameral antibiotics, instillation of povidone-iodine into the conjunctival sac, and periorbital skin preparation with povidone-iodine were the most commonly endorsed measures, although recommended concentrations, dosages, and contact times varied. Several guidelines did not address ancillary measures, such as face washing, postoperative eye protection or adjunctive topical antibiotics. While core prophylactic strategies were broadly agreed upon, significant differences persisted likely due to disparate local regulations, idiosyncratic practices, and interpretations of the evidence. Careful selection and employment of any procedure should be tailored according to patient characteristics and circumstances.

Indexed as

antibioticsinfectionintracameralphacoemulsificationprevention

Identifiers

PMID41181299
PMCPMC12577578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.