Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181283›Full record

ArticleActa medica Philippina2025

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Various Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Vaccines against Emerging Variants of Concern in the Philippines.

Haidee A Valverde, Clarence C Yacapin, Paul Matthew D Pasco, Joana Ophelia M Real, Jaifred Christian F Lopez, Hannah Eleanor Clapham, Yi Zhen Chew, Chris Erwin G Mercado, Siobhan Botwright, Madison Silzle and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haidee A ValverdeInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Clarence C YacapinInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Paul Matthew D PascoInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Joana Ophelia M RealInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Jaifred Christian F LopezInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Hannah Eleanor ClaphamSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Yi Zhen ChewSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Chris Erwin G MercadoSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Siobhan BotwrightHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Thailand.
Madison SilzleHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Thailand.
Hilton Y LamInstitute of Health Policy and Development Studies, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: During the early COVID-19 pandemic (2020 to mid-2021), the Philippine government relied on non-pharmaceutical interventions such as lockdowns and Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ). With the emergency use authorization of vaccines, assessing their potential impact became essential. This study develops a Philippine model to evaluate the epidemiologic and economic effects of COVID-19 vaccination, estimating its impact on mortality, hospitalization, and mild/asymptomatic cases under various prioritization strategies, including booster doses and the presence of variants of concern. Methods: A dynamic transmission model (DTM) with an SEIR (Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered) structure was calibrated using local data, including case numbers, deaths, seroprevalence, vaccination coverage, and intervention costs. The model's outputs informed a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from health system and societal perspectives over a two-year horizon. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were calculated, with costs adjusted to 2020 prices and discount rates of 3%-10% applied. Sensitivity analyses, including one-way and probabilistic approaches, assessed robustness, while a budget impact analysis (BIA) estimated government expenditures in 2020 and 2021. Results: Without vaccination, daily cases could have peaked at 400,000 between February and May 2021. A vaccination campaign was projected to reduce cases to around 20,000, significantly lowering mortality.From the health system perspective, the estimated cost without vaccination was PhP 14.46 trillion, with 93.83 million QALYs. With vaccination, costs dropped to PhP 2.36 trillion, while QALYs increased to 101.79 million. From the societal perspective, costs were PhP 14.68 trillion without vaccination and PhP 2.38 trillion with vaccination, with the same QALY outcomes. CEA results confirmed that vaccination was cost-saving, with ICERs of -PhP 1,520,727.28 per QALY (health system) and -PhP 1,546,171.63 per QALY (societal). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings, with one-way sensitivity analysis showing minimal impact from parameter changes and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirming cost-saving outcomes. The BIA estimated government expenditures of PhP 983.45 billion in 2020 and PhP 1.47 trillion in 2021 for the vaccine scenario, lower than the no-vaccine scenario. Conclusion: Indeed, our modeling has shown that COVID-19 vaccines could mitigate the spread of COVID-19 and provide good value for money.

Indexed as

cost-effectiveness analysisCOVID-19epidemiologic modelPhilippinesvaccine

Identifiers

PMID41181283
PMCPMC12572875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.