Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181279›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

A comparative observational study on the effect of two different doses of fentanyl on the effect site concentration of propofol during induction of anesthesia using clinical assessment score and bispectral index.

Anu David, Lini Chacko, Binu P Simon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anu DavidDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Lini ChackoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.
Binu P SimonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Opioids are known to reduce the propofol dose required to blunt movement and hemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli. However, the optimal propofol dosage for smooth induction remains unclear, particularly in the Indian population where pharmacokinetic data is limited. This study aims to evaluate the effect site concentration of propofol in conjunction with varying fentanyl doses, with relation to loss of consciousness and bispectral index (BIS) values during anesthesia induction using target-controlled infusion (TCI). Material and Methods: Sixty patients aged 20-50 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were included. Anesthesia induction was performed using a TCI pump with propofol based on the Schnider model, starting at 1.5 µg/ml and increasing at 0.5 µg/ml until loss of verbal response, followed by 0.2 µg/ml till the final clinical endpoint was reached. Patients received either 1 or 2 µg/kg fentanyl or no fentanyl. Endpoints were assessed using the BIS monitor and Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score. Results: Hemodynamic parameters were stable across groups. The effect site concentration of propofol for loss of response to noxious stimuli was significantly lower in the fentanyl groups (fentanyl 1 µg/kg- 2.90 ± 0.1947 µg/ml, fentanyl 2 µg/kg- 2.445 ± 0.23 µg/ml) compared to the propofol alone group (4.205 ± 0.909 µg/ml) ( Conclusions: Propofol effect site concentrations were significantly higher without fentanyl. The findings contribute valuable data for refining pharmacokinetic models tailored to individual patient needs.

Indexed as

Bispectral indexeffect site concentrationfentanylpharmacokineticspropofoltarget controlled infusion pump (https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov/MeSHon Demand)

Identifiers

PMID41181279
PMCPMC12578057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.