ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve with genicular nerve block in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided IPACK Block for Posterior Knee Pain in Advanced Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Prospective Single-Arm Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Genicular nerve block has recently become a promising treatment option along with radiofrequency ablation in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee. Material and Methods: Sixty patients of age above 50 years with a pain pattern consistent with osteoarthritis of the knee, with their X-ray knee joint findings corresponding to their clinical symptoms, and with a failure to respond to conservative treatment were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 each as follows: group I: patients were administered fluoroscope-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve using RF electrode set to a temperature of 60℃ for 120 sec and group II: patients were administered fluoroscope-guided genicular nerve block using 9 ml drug solution comprising 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 1 ml (40 mg) of methylprednisolone. Results: Both techniques of knee injection were effective and provided good pain relief to the patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Pain scores were clinically less in group I compared to group II at all time intervals of the study period. However, they were statistically significant between the two groups at 2, 3, 6, and 12 months ( Conclusions: Fluoroscope-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerve is better than fluoroscope-guided genicular nerve block in terms of improvement in pain score, physical status, and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.