ArticleIranian journal of parasitology
Genetic Identification of
Article in Iranian journal of parasitology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hydatidosis is one of the common parasitic diseases common to both humans and animals with global spread. The disease is very important from both public health and economic perspectives. The parasite presents with highly diverse genetic features, including a different genotype which affect the life cycle of the parasite, its transmission routes, pathogenicity, immunogenicity, response to drugs, epidemiology and disease control. Therefore, we aimed to identify the genotype of hydatid cysts isolated from slaughtered animals in Sabzevar and Neyshabour slaughterhouses by sequencing and high-resolution melting curve analysis. Methods: Out of 35 hydatid cyst samples, including 19 from sheep (15 liver and 4 lung samples) and 16 from cattle (9 liver and 7 lung samples) were included in this study. After the extraction of protoscoleces and DNA, a high-resolution melting curve analysis method was used to identify the genotype of the samples using pre-determined G1, G3, and G6 standard samples. Results: Out of 35 hydatid cyst samples, 89.5% G1 and 10.5% G6 were detected in sheep samples, and 93.7% G1 and 6.3% G6 were detected in cattle samples. Results showed in the Sabzevar City, dominant genotype there was G1 and Conclusion: G1 was the most prevalent in samples of hydatid cysts (both sheep and cattle) in Sabzevar, while in Neyshabour samples, G1 and G6 were the most dominant types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.