Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41181137›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Beyond CAR-T Cells: exploring CAR-NK, CAR-M, and CAR-γδ T strategies in solid tumor immunotherapy.

Yingjie Hou, Shihua Hu, Chong Liu, Xin Chen, Yuru Wang, Youzherui Li, Zihe Fu, Chunjing Feng, Yanhua Gong, Zichuan Liu and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. CAR-macrophages: a new chapter in cancer immunotherapy.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Targeting Macrophages in Immunotherapy: The Ascent of CAR-Macrophages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yingjie Hou *School of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shihua Hu *Thinking Biomed (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing Economic and Technological Development Zone, Beijing, China.
Chong LiuTianjin University and Health-Biotech United Group Joint Laboratory of Innovative Drug Development and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xin ChenSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yuru WangSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Youzherui LiTianjin University and Health-Biotech United Group Joint Laboratory of Innovative Drug Development and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zihe FuTianjin University and Health-Biotech United Group Joint Laboratory of Innovative Drug Development and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Chunjing FengTianjin University and Health-Biotech United Group Joint Laboratory of Innovative Drug Development and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Yanhua GongSchool of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Zichuan LiuTianjin University and Health-Biotech United Group Joint Laboratory of Innovative Drug Development and Translational Medicine, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Shouchun PengDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Jinnan Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) employing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) engineering represents a transformative advancement in cancer immunotherapy. CAR-T cell therapies have demonstrated significant clinical success in hematological malignancies, yet their application to solid tumors faces persistent challenges. Key limitations include the paucity of tumor-specific antigens, poor intratumoral infiltration, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and treatment-related toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. In contrast, CAR natural killer (CAR-NK) cells show promise in solid tumors such as ovarian, pancreatic, and glioblastoma, with encouraging preclinical and early clinical evidence, although limited persistence and antigen heterogeneity remain major challenges. Unlike CAR-T cells, CAR-NK therapies mediate tumor clearance through both cytotoxic (e.g., granzyme/perforin release) and cytokine-mediated mechanisms while mitigating toxicity risks. Their lack of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) dependency enables "off-the-shelf" manufacturing from allogeneic donors, circumventing patient-specific production bottlenecks. CAR-macrophage (CAR-M) therapies further address solid tumor barriers by leveraging innate phagocytic clearance, antigen-presenting functions, and TME penetration. Macrophages inherently infiltrate hypoxic tumor regions and remodel stromal barriers, enabling CAR-Ms to synergize with adaptive immunity by cross-priming T cells. Preclinical models highlight CAR-M efficacy in depleting immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and reversing TME-driven immune evasion. Emerging CAR- Gamma-Delta T (CAR-γδ T) cell therapies combine CAR-mediated antigen specificity with the intrinsic tumoricidal activity of γδ T cells, which recognize stress-induced ligands independently of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) presentation. This dual-targeting capability enhances tumor selectivity while reducing on-target/off-tumor toxicity. This review systematically examines cellular sources, mechanistic advantages and clinical progress. By evaluating these platforms' complementary strengths, we propose rational strategies for integrating CAR-NK, CAR-M, and CAR-γδ T cells into tailored therapeutic regimens for solid tumors.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansMacrophagesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaReceptors, Chimeric Antigenchimeric antigen receptormacrophage cellsNK cellssolid tumorγδT cells

Identifiers

PMID41181137
PMCPMC12571916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.