ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Marburg and Sudan viruses elicit divergent interferon responses and cytokine storm signaling in Egyptian rousette bat macrophages.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Egyptian rousette bats (ERBs) are the only known natural reservoir of Marburg virus (MARV), etiologic agent of a highly-pathogenic zoonotic viral hemorrhagic fever. Evolutionary adaptations in ERBs allow for fine-tuned discrete pro-inflammatory immune responses that control MARV infection, yet permit population-level viral maintenance. Methods: To look for exclusive co-adapted responses between ERBs and MARV, we compared macrophage (MΦ) responses to MARV and Sudan virus (SUDV), a related filovirus not hosted by ERBs. We queried whether MARV counters normal ERB MΦ responses, illuminating co-adapted host responses not observed upon infection with SUDV, which fails to establish a productive infection and is efficiently immunologically cleared by ERBs. Results: We observed stark differences in MΦ transcriptional responses to MARV and SUDV, including differences in type I and III interferon (IFN)-related genes, cytokines, chemokines, cell growth and proliferation genes. We show for the first time that while MARV-infected bat MΦs undergo muted IFN responses and cytokine storm signaling, SUDV induces unperturbed type I and III IFN gene expression, stronger cytokine and chemokine responses resembling typical host responses to a foreign viral pathogen. Discussion: Our findings corroborate growing evidence of unique coevolutionary relationships between bats and the specific viruses they harbor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.