ArticleInternational journal of tryptophan research : IJTR2025
Development of a Novel Method to Quantify Quinolinic Acid in Biological Samples.
Article in International journal of tryptophan research : IJTR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accumulation of quinolinic acid (QUIN) in cerebrospinal fluid and serum may be used as a biomarker for various neuropsychiatric and inflammatory diseases. In this study, we developed a highly sensitive method to measure QUIN. Methods: A reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with fluorescence detection was established based on the enzymatic conversion of QUIN to nicotinic acid mononucleotide by recombinant quinolinic acid phosphoribosyltransferase, followed by the formation of fluorescent (BODIPY)-labeled deamido-NAD by recombinant nicotinic acid mononucleotide adenyltransferase. Results: BODIPY-deamido-NAD was isocratically eluted within 6 minutes using reverse-phase chromatography and its chromatographic peak was resolved. The calibration range, precision, and analytical recovery of the QUIN assay are suitable for the analysis of biological fluids. Compared with published quantitation limits for QUIN measurement by HPLC, this method is at least 30-fold more sensitive and has a lower limit of detection of 5.0 nmol/L. The sensitivity was comparable to that previously reported for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and the quantitation results of QUIN from samples of cerebrospinal fluid correlated well with that of the GC/MS method. Conclusions: We established a novel method to quantify QUIN in biological samples. Due to its high sensitivity and the fact that it does not rely on MS instrumentation, this method has the potential for widespread adoption in research laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.