ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Effectiveness of surgical skin preparation solutions in orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review of the current comparative literature.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) is a major concern in orthopaedic surgery procedures as they can have devastating consequences for patients and their outcomes. Many infection prevention measures are routinely taken in order to prevent infection during surgery, the main one being surgical skin preparation prior to any incision.
aimTo investigate the efficacy of different perioperative surgical skin preparation products commonly used in orthopaedic surgery.
methodsSeven databases were searched from inception to January 25, 2025, using a combination of keywords and medical subject headings terms, specifically for studies comparing any two surgical skin preparation products used at any point prior to skin incision for orthopaedic procedures. Titles and abstracts were screened and full texts reviewed based on inclusion criteria. Data was extracted on study design, interventions, and outcomes from studies that met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not completed due to heterogeneity.
resultsThirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria in this systematic review. In extremity fracture surgery, evidence was mixed on whether iodine or chlorhexidine-based solutions are more effective at preventing SSI. No significant difference was found between iodine and chlorhexidine-based solutions in total joint arthroplasty, spine surgery, foot and ankle surgery, or upper extremity surgery. No tested preparation method was superior in reducing positive
conclusionCurrent literature shows no significant difference between chlorhexidine-based and iodine-based skin preparation solutions in orthopaedic extremity or spine surgery regarding SSI prevention or culture results. Likewise, adding other antiseptic agents provided no clear benefit. While skin antisepsis is important, many different factors contribute to SSI risk outside of the skin preparation solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.