ArticleWorld journal of orthopedics2025
Normative values of ankle strength and its importance for rehabilitation and return to activity: A cross-sectional study.
Article in World journal of orthopedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnkle normative values are limited compared to isokinetic knee assessments. Chronic ankle instability correlates with agonist-antagonist imbalances, decreased evertor/invertor ratio, and plantar flexion deficits. Strengthening programs targeting evertor/invertor and dorsiflexor/plantar flexor balance help reduce injury recurrence. Bilateral neuromuscular deficits compromise the contralateral side, rendering healthy limbs unsuitable as recovery references. Defining normative healthy ankle parameters is crucial for establishing precise limits in non-surgical treatments and sports return criteria. While the limb symmetry index (LSI) is used for knees with a cutoff of > 90%, no such standardization exists for the ankle.
aimTo comprehensively evaluate isokinetic ankle strength profiles in non-athletic individuals.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study. Two hundred ankles were evaluated using the Biodex 3 System to assess eversion, inversion, dorsiflexion, and plantar flexion. Healthy individuals with an active lifestyle and no previous injuries were evaluated. The Maximum Torque, Agonist/Antagonist Ratio, LSI, and Muscular Deficiency Index (MDI) and the correlation with demographic variables were evaluated.
resultsThe mean age (mean ± SD) was 38.5 ± 13.5 years, and the body mass index (BMI) was 25.8 ± 4.2 in 69 men and 31 women. The mean maximum torque values by gender were (mean ± SD): 22.3 ± 6.6 female (F) and 33.4 ± 9.9 male (M) N/m for eversion; 30.10 ± 10.0 (F) and 37.0 ± 11.6 N/m (M) for inversion, 37.4 ± 10.0 (F) and 53.6 ± 13.0 N/m (M) for dorsiflexion, and 100.4 ± 37.2 (F) and 158.1 ± 33.4 (M) N/m for flexion. There was no correlation between age or BMI and maximum torque. The evertors/invertors ratio was 88.8%, and the dorsiflexors/plantar flexors ratio was 36.1%. The MDI and LSI were balanced between sides for every movement, having an average global difference of less than 10%.
conclusionThese findings provide gender-specific normative isokinetic values for the ankle in healthy, physically active adults. These reference parameters-especially LSI and MDI above 90%-can support clinical decision-making in rehabilitation planning and return-to-sport assessment, offering objective benchmarks for functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.