ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2025
Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: Enhancing quality indicators for optimal patient outcomes.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Lesion Detection: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: 2026 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ethical and Legal Implications of Implementing AI in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Human-machine collaboration in colorectal cancer screening: a narrative review of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging endoscopic resection strategies for organ preservation in early colorectal cancer.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the cornerstone of colorectal cancer prevention and surveillance, but the procedure's effectiveness is entirely dependent upon various quality indicators, such as detection rates, withdrawal time, adequate bowel preparation, cecal intubation rate and patient outcomes. Despite progress in endoscopic techniques, challenges persist in maintaining endoscopists' consistent performance and improving quality metrics. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a "game changer" in the gastroenterology field, offering the opportunity to significantly increase colonoscopy quality. This review highlights the role of AI-driven technologies such as deep learning, computer vision, and real-time feedback mechanisms in optimizing key quality indicators of colonoscopy. The implementation of AI in colonoscopy may reduce human error, improve endoscopist's consistency in real-time decision making, ensuring higher reliability and standardization during the procedure. Furthermore, AI has the potential to reshape how endoscopists perform and evaluate procedures, while improved lesion characterization may enable more precise selection for resection, reducing morbidity and the incidence of interval cancers. The review also addresses challenges and limitations in AI integration, including cost-effectiveness and its impact on endoscopist training. AI holds substantial promise for advancing colonoscopy quality and elevating overall patient care, paving the way for more effective and personalized medical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.