ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
Asymmetric integration of various cancer datasets for identifying risk-associated variants and genes.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Cancer genomic research provides an opportunity to identify cancer risk-associated genes, but often suffers from undesirable low statistical power due to a limited sample size. Integrated analysis with different cancers has the potential to enhance statistical power for identifying pan-cancer risk genes. However, substantial heterogeneity across various cancers makes this challenging. Results: Recently, a novel asymmetric integration method was developed that can deal with data heterogeneity and exclude unhelpful datasets from the analysis. We adapted and applied this method to integrate genotype datasets with matched case and control individuals from the Michigan Genomics Initiative, using each cancer as the primary dataset of interest and the other cancers as auxiliary datasets, respectively. Conditional logistic regression models were coupled with the asymmetric integrated framework to handle the matched case-control study design and permutation tests were performed to control for false discovery rates (FDRs). At the same FDR level, the integrated analysis found more potential genetic variants and genes that are associated with the risks of various cancers, showcasing the promise of the proposed approach for integrated analysis of cancer datasets. Availability and implementation: Our method is available as source code at https://github.com/rxxwang/integrate_cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.