ReviewInternational journal of transgender health2025
Improving the healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse youths: A mixed-methods systematic review of interventions.
Review in International journal of transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "I don't like fitting a box, except the box I am": genderqueer and nonbinary (GQNB) patient strategies for navigating healthcare.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Good GP care for transgender children: The parents' perspectives.International journal of transgender health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Health disparities are commonly identified within the transgender and gender-diverse community. Gender minority stress theory expands the existing minority stress theory to identify the unique stressors of this community. The outcomes of these stressors and disparities are recurring negative experiences among transgender and gender-diverse youths and subsequent care avoidance. This mixed-methods systematic review aims to identify and critically analyze the effect of interventions to improve the healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse youths. Methods: Studies published from inception until April 2023 were sought from CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PubMed, Academic Search Complete, PsycArticles, PsycInfo, ERIC, SocIndex, target journals, trial registries, and countries with significant transgender and gender-diverse academic outputs. Studies were double screened for eligibility. The included studies were critically appraised and assessed for risk of bias. Data were extracted and convergent segregated synthesis was conducted to synthesize evidence from various research designs. Results: In total, 4487 records were identified. Of those, nine studies were included, and three narratives were identified: components of intervention design, impact of the intervention on transgender and gender-diverse youths, and impact of the intervention on healthcare providers. Interventions were predominantly education-based, in-person, targeted healthcare providers and assessed knowledge, beliefs, confidence, and understanding of transgender healthcare. Transgender and gender-diverse focused education interventions demonstrated more significant differences in outcomes when compared with LGBT + focused interventions. Interventions that included social contact with transgender and gender-diverse individuals demonstrated more significant outcomes in both beliefs and knowledge. Conclusion: A targeted approach to the development and delivery of interventions is needed to improve outcomes, including the co-production of interventions, specific content, and the application of social contact with youths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.