ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2025
Parental perspectives on fertility preservation for their trans and gender-expansive children: Reflections on complexities of autonomy, support, and societal realities.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Navigating fertility preservation poses unique challenges for young transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youths, who must balance short-term concerns like delaying gender-affirming hormonal treatment (GAHT) with long-term considerations of potential infertility. Parents play a crucial role in supporting their TGE children through their gender affirmation journey, which includes discussions about fertility preservation. Aim: This study aimed to explore parental feelings and attitudes toward the fertility preservation of their TGE children, acknowledging the diverse perspectives shaped by societal, legal, and personal factors. Methods: The study involved 82 parents who completed an online-distributed questionnaire. Participants were parents of TGE youths aged between six and twenty-five years old. The mixed-methods study utilized a tailored questionnaire comprising both open-ended and closed-ended questions. Results: Descriptive analysis revealed that a significant majority of parents were aware of the effects of GAHT on fertility, with 65.3% expressing a desire for their children to have their own children in the future. However, parents shared that only 14.5% of children underwent a fertility preservation pathway, while 68.1% did not, citing barriers such as lack of services, cost, and procedural distress. Qualitative analysis identified four main themes: (1) Emotional response, (2) Parental expectations, (3) Parent-Child relationship, and (4) Structural barriers. Discussion: Overall, the study underscores the multifaceted nature of parental experiences regarding fertility preservation for TGE individuals, emphasizing the importance of addressing societal norms, personal expectations, and structural barriers to ensure equitable access to reproductive healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.