Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180894›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Human-centered design of an artificial intelligence monitoring system: the Vanderbilt Algorithmovigilance Monitoring and Operations System.

Megan E Salwei, Sharon E Davis, Carrie Reale, Laurie L Novak, Colin G Walsh, Russ Beebe, Scott Nelson, Sameer Sundrani, Susannah Rose, Adam Wright and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Explainability in context: calibrating appropriate trust and reliance in artificial intelligence.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Design and Early Evaluation of an Algorithmovigilance System.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Gaps in artificial intelligence research for rural health in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Megan E SalweiCenter for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-2501
Sharon E DavisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0792-8867
Carrie RealeCenter for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.
Laurie L NovakCenter for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-4301
Colin G WalshDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.
Russ BeebeCenter for Research and Innovation in Systems Safety, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.
Scott NelsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1941-1817
Sameer SundraniDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.
Susannah RoseDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5895-7460
Adam WrightDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6844-145X
Michael RippergerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.
Peter ShaveDepartment of Health IT, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, United States.
Peter EmbíDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37203, United States.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: As the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare is rapidly expanding, there is also growing recognition of the need for ongoing monitoring of AI after implementation, called Materials and Methods: We assembled a multidisciplinary team to plan AI monitoring and governance at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. We then conducted 9 participatory design sessions with diverse stakeholders to develop prototypes of VAMOS. Once we had a working prototype, we conducted 8 formative design interviews with key stakeholders to gather feedback on the system. We analyzed the interviews using a rapid qualitative analysis approach and revised the mock-ups. We then conducted a multidisciplinary heuristic evaluation to identify further improvements to the tool. Results: Through an iterative, HCD process that engaged diverse end-users, we identified key components needed in AI monitoring systems. We identified specific data views and functionality required by end users across several user interfaces including a performance monitoring dashboard, accordion snapshots, and model-specific pages. Discussion: We distilled general design requirements for systems to support AI monitoring throughout its lifecycle. One important consideration is how to support teams of health system leaders, clinical experts, and technical personnel that are distributed across the organization as they monitor and respond to algorithm deterioration. Conclusion: VAMOS aims to support systematic and proactive monitoring of AI tools in healthcare organizations. Our findings and recommendations can support the design of AI monitoring systems to support health systems, improve quality of care, and ensure patient safety.

Indexed as

algorithmovigilanceartificial intelligencehuman-centered designmonitoringsafety

Identifiers

PMID41180894
PMCPMC12574793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.