Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41180893›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Automated survey collection with LLM-based conversational agents.

Kurmanbek Kaiyrbekov, Nicholas J Dobbins, Sean D Mooney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kurmanbek KaiyrbekovCyberinfrastructure and Artificial Intelligence Platforms Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-1243
Nicholas J DobbinsBiomedical Informatics & Data Science, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-8747
Sean D MooneyCyberinfrastructure and Artificial Intelligence Platforms Section, Center for Genomics and Data Science Research, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-0833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Phone surveys are crucial for collecting health data but are expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to scale. To overcome these limitations, we propose a survey collection approach powered by conversational Large Language Models (LLMs). Materials and Methods: Our framework leverages an LLM-powered conversational agent to conduct surveys and transcribe conversations, along with an LLM (GPT-4o) to extract responses from the transcripts. We evaluated the framework's performance by analyzing transcription errors, the accuracy of inferred survey responses, and participant experiences across 40 survey responses collected from a convenience sample of 8 individuals, each adopting the role of five LLM-generated personas. Results: GPT-4o extracted responses to survey questions with an average accuracy of 98%, despite an average transcription word error rate of 7.7%. Participants reported occasional errors by the conversational agent but praised its ability to demonstrate comprehension and maintain engaging conversations. Discussion and Conclusion: Our study showcases the potential of LLM agents to enable scalable, AI-powered phone surveys, reducing human effort and advancing healthcare data collection.

Indexed as

large language modelsmachine learningnatural language processingsurveys

Identifiers

PMID41180893
PMCPMC12574787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.