ArticleJAMIA open2025
Automated survey collection with LLM-based conversational agents.
Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Innovation to Impact: The CREATE Framework as a Blueprint for Large Language Model Adoption in Opioid Treatment Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Generative AI, foundation models and large language models in radiation therapy physics: Clinical applications, challenges, and future directions.Medical physics · 2026Review
- A comprehensive survey of AI agents in healthcare.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Review
- AI-powered Chatbot integration for enhanced accessibility of electronic health records in a pediatric hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Phone surveys are crucial for collecting health data but are expensive, time-consuming, and difficult to scale. To overcome these limitations, we propose a survey collection approach powered by conversational Large Language Models (LLMs). Materials and Methods: Our framework leverages an LLM-powered conversational agent to conduct surveys and transcribe conversations, along with an LLM (GPT-4o) to extract responses from the transcripts. We evaluated the framework's performance by analyzing transcription errors, the accuracy of inferred survey responses, and participant experiences across 40 survey responses collected from a convenience sample of 8 individuals, each adopting the role of five LLM-generated personas. Results: GPT-4o extracted responses to survey questions with an average accuracy of 98%, despite an average transcription word error rate of 7.7%. Participants reported occasional errors by the conversational agent but praised its ability to demonstrate comprehension and maintain engaging conversations. Discussion and Conclusion: Our study showcases the potential of LLM agents to enable scalable, AI-powered phone surveys, reducing human effort and advancing healthcare data collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.